deepseek Reasoning Model

★ 5 (1.690 uses)

DeepSeek-R1 Formal Math Theorem Prover & Lean 4 Code Synthesizer

Deep reasoning formal mathematics prompt. Deconstructs complex theorems into induction hypotheses, tactic trees (simp, ring, omega, linarith), and verified Lean 4 code.

⏱️ 1 min breakdown (175 words) • ✓ 2026 Engine Calibrated

𝕏 Share in Post

Parametric Customizer & Compiler Live Tool

Adjust the variables below. The prompt code and API payload update dynamically in real time.

1690 uses

Fast Presets:

Theorem Statement to Prove

The mathematical proposition

Mathematical Domain

Tactics & Mathlib Preference

Target proof solver tactics

Ready-to-Run Compiled Prompt

0 words • 0 tokens • Est: <$0.0001 • Grade 8 • Optimal Clarity • ⚡ 99.4% Match • ⏱️ Saves ~45m ($35 value) •

You are a World-Class Mathematician and Formal Verification Researcher specializing in the Lean 4 interactive theorem prover.

Formulate and formally prove the following mathematical claim:
- **Theorem Statement**: {For all natural numbers n, the sum of the first n positive integers equals n * (n + 1) / 2}
- **Target Mathematical Domain**: {Discrete Mathematics & Number Theory}
- **Allowed Lean 4 Tactics**: {Lean 4 Mathlib (induction, omega, ring, linarith)}

### REASONING PROTOCOL (<think>):
1. State the mathematical lemma in formal mathematical notation.
2. Construct the high-level human-readable proof by structural induction, contradiction, or algebraic simplification.
3. Identify potential edge cases (division by zero, empty sets, negative integers, convergence bounds).
4. Translate the proof steps into Lean 4 syntax, declaring intermediate `have` statements to assist the tactic solver.
5. Verify that no `sorry` placeholders remain in the formal proof.

Provide the complete, compile-ready Lean 4 file with imports, theorem declarations, and tactical proofs.

Solve Math with DeepSeek-R1

Frontier open-weights reasoning model for formal logic and mathematics.

⚡

Featured AI Partner Verified

Leonardo Phoenix & Flux: Generate photorealistic studio assets with 150 daily free credits. Zero setup required.

Claim Free Credits →

🚀 3-Step Production Execution Blueprint

How senior engineers and top creators calibrate, customize, and verify this prompt formula in production.

01 Setup & Scope

Target Engine Calibration

Drop this prompt into your project root as `.cursorrules` or load it into Claude 3.5 Sonnet / DeepSeek-R1 system instructions.

02 Customization

Dynamic Parameterization

Adjust the dynamic variables (framework, database, and client state) to match your active codebase architecture.

03 Verification

Sanity & Boundary Check

Run a verification query asking the model to declare its architectural constraints before it generates the first line of code.

⚙️ Recommended API Hyperparameter Calibration

Verified 2026 Settings

Temperature

0.15

Top-P / Guidance

0.95

Max Tokens

4,096

Freq Penalty

0.00

Pres Penalty

0.00

Context Budget

8,000 - 32,000 tokens

CALIBRATION INSIGHT: Low temperature ensures deterministic syntax, accurate AST parsing, and zero hallucinated API methods.

📸 Real Sample Outputs & Verified Results

Visual evidence and benchmark responses generated using this exact prompt formula.

import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring def sum_first_n : ℕ → ℕ | 0 => 0 | n + 1 => (n + 1) + sum_first_n n theorem sum_formula (n : ℕ) : 2 * sum_first_n n = n * (n + 1) := by induction n with | zero => rfl | succ k ih => simp [sum_first_n] linarith

Lean 4 Tactic Proof Snippet

🔬 Prompt Engineering Anatomy

Why this prompt consistently delivers high-tier results: technical parameter breakdown.

1 Lean 4 Tactic Trees

Lean 4 uses interactive tactics like omega and ring that discharge arithmetic equalities automatically.

PRO TIP: DeepSeek-R1's <think> tokens explore intermediate lemma lemmas before producing final tactic sequences.

2 Zero Sorry Invariant

Prohibits the 'sorry' keyword in Lean, ensuring the proof is 100% mathematically verified by the kernel.

PRO TIP: Break large theorems into smaller private helper lemmas.

⚠️ Critical Anti-Patterns & Execution Traps

The top 3 engineering mistakes to avoid when deploying this category of prompt into production.

TRAP 01

Context Window Flooding

Pasting 50 unminified files into the prompt degrades attention, causing the LLM to ignore core TypeScript rules.

Production Remedy: Use modular file-tree references and only pass active component interfaces.

TRAP 02

Missing Delimiter Isolation

Letting user instructions mix directly with system rules triggers instruction drift and hallucinations.

Production Remedy: Wrap code files and untrusted requirements in formal XML tags like <system_code> and <requirements>.

TRAP 03

Over-Relying on Outdated Paradigms

Allowing the model to use deprecated React 18 patterns (e.g. useEffect for data fetching) creates security vulnerabilities.

Production Remedy: Explicitly enforce React 19 Server Components and Next.js 15 Server Actions in negative constraints.

💬 Frequently Asked Questions

Troubleshooting common edge cases, model incompatibilities, and best practices.

Does this work with Lean 4 Mathlib updates?

Yes, it conforms strictly to the latest Lean 4 syntax and Mathlib4 conventions.

Why is DeepSeek-R1 better at formal verification than standard models?

Reinforcement learning from mathematical verification rewards DeepSeek-R1 for exploring backtracking paths that satisfy strict compiler type-checking.